As fantasy football enthusiasts gear up for another exhilarating season, the debate surrounding wide receivers often takes center stage. Among the most discussed players are Courtland Sutton and Diontae Johnson. Both athletes have showcased immense talent and potential, leaving fantasy managers torn between whom to draft. With their unique skill sets and differing team dynamics, understanding their performance metrics and overall value is crucial.
Fans and analysts alike are constantly weighing the pros and cons of each player, making it essential to delve deeper into their stats, injury histories, and production trends. The question isn't just about who has the better stats but also which player aligns more closely with your fantasy team's needs. This article aims to explore the strengths and weaknesses of both Sutton and Johnson to help you make an informed decision.
Throughout the course of this article, we will analyze various aspects of Sutton and Johnson's game, from their individual stats to their team situations, and even their potential for the upcoming season. Let’s dive into the world of fantasy football and uncover the answer to the burning question: Sutton or Diontae Johnson?
Who is Courtland Sutton?
Courtland Sutton is a wide receiver for the Denver Broncos, known for his impressive physical attributes and playmaking ability. Drafted in the second round of the 2018 NFL Draft, Sutton quickly established himself as a key player for the Broncos, showcasing his skills in both contested catches and route running. His combination of size and speed makes him a formidable target on the field.
What are Courtland Sutton’s Career Stats?
Year | Games Played | Receptions | Receiving Yards | Touchdowns |
---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | 16 | 42 | 704 | 4 |
2019 | 16 | 72 | 1,112 | 6 |
2020 | 12 | 43 | 619 | 1 |
2021 | 17 | 58 | 776 | 2 |
2022 | 16 | 64 | 829 | 2 |
Who is Diontae Johnson?
Diontae Johnson, a wide receiver for the Pittsburgh Steelers, has emerged as a reliable target since he was drafted in the third round of the 2019 NFL Draft. Known for his agility and precise route-running, Johnson has consistently been one of the most targeted players on his team. His ability to create separation from defenders makes him a valuable asset for the Steelers’ offense.
What are Diontae Johnson’s Career Stats?
Year | Games Played | Receptions | Receiving Yards | Touchdowns |
---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | 16 | 59 | 680 | 5 |
2020 | 16 | 88 | 923 | 7 |
2021 | 17 | 107 | 1,161 | 8 |
2022 | 16 | 86 | 882 | 2 |
How do Sutton and Johnson Compare in Terms of Fantasy Points?
When evaluating Sutton or Diontae Johnson for your fantasy roster, it’s vital to consider their average points per game (PPG) over the last few seasons. While both players have had their ups and downs, their scoring potential often fluctuates based on their respective team situations and quarterback play. Here's a quick breakdown:
- **Courtland Sutton:** Average PPG of 12.5 over the last two seasons.
- **Diontae Johnson:** Average PPG of 15.1 over the last two seasons.
What are the Strengths and Weaknesses of Sutton and Johnson?
Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of each player can help you make an informed decision. Here’s a quick analysis:
Strengths of Courtland Sutton:
- Physicality and size allow him to win contested catches.
- Ability to stretch the field and create big plays.
Weaknesses of Courtland Sutton:
- Inconsistent quarterback play can hinder his production.
- Struggles with injuries in previous seasons.
Strengths of Diontae Johnson:
- Elite route running and ability to create separation.
- High target share, particularly in passing-heavy game scripts.
Weaknesses of Diontae Johnson:
- Occasional drops can lead to frustrating performances.
- Injury concerns have arisen in the past.
Which Player Has the Better Supporting Cast?
The effectiveness of Sutton or Diontae Johnson is also influenced by the players surrounding them. On the Denver Broncos, Sutton has seen changes in the quarterback position, which can impact his overall performance. In contrast, Johnson benefits from a more stable quarterback situation with the Steelers and a proven offensive scheme.
How Does the Offensive Scheme Affect Their Production?
A crucial factor to consider when comparing Sutton or Diontae Johnson is the offensive scheme each player operates within. The Steelers have consistently featured a pass-heavy offense that often targets Johnson, while the Broncos have fluctuated between run-heavy and pass-heavy strategies. This inconsistency can directly impact Sutton's fantasy production.
What Should Fantasy Managers Consider When Drafting?
As the fantasy draft approaches, managers must weigh their options carefully. Here are some essential considerations when deciding between Sutton or Diontae Johnson:
- **Injury History:** Evaluate each player’s injury track record.
- **Quarterback Performance:** Consider the stability and performance of their quarterbacks.
- **Offensive Scheme:** Analyze the offensive strategies of their respective teams.
- **Consistency:** Look at their weekly fantasy point averages and trends.
Who Should You Choose: Sutton or Diontae Johnson?
Ultimately, the decision between Sutton or Diontae Johnson hinges on personal preferences and team needs. If you value a receiver with a high target share and consistent production, Diontae Johnson may be the better option. However, if you're looking for a high-upside player who can make big plays, Sutton could be your guy. Consider your overall roster construction and weigh the potential risks and rewards associated with each player.
Conclusion: Sutton or Diontae Johnson?
In the end, the choice between Sutton or Diontae Johnson comes down to your fantasy strategy and the specific dynamics of your league. Both players have shown flashes of brilliance and have the potential to be game-changers. By considering their strengths, weaknesses, and supporting cast, you can make an informed decision that could lead to fantasy football success this season. No matter your choice, both Sutton and Johnson are poised to make significant impacts on the field.